Is the moon an artificially created object? Proven. Is the Moon an artificial satellite of the Earth? Existing information that the Moon is an artificial satellite

3.4. The Moon is an artificial satellite of the Earth (or a spaceship of ALIENS).

*****
...The life of humanity is vigilantly and attentively watched by beings more developed than man... It never occurred to anyone that the older worlds of the Universe are a source of danger for the human race... Meanwhile, through the abyss of space, beings with eyes full of envy looked at the Earth highly developed, cold, insensitive intellect, superior to us as much as we are superior to extinct animals, and slowly but surely carried out their plans hostile to us.

H.G. Wells "War of the Worlds"

Our planet has been in captivity for thousands of years under the “Moon Rainbow” or more simply the Moon. This is a huge ship of planetary dimensions, an artificial satellite of our planet. In this ship, our ancestors arrived from the depths of space and created this testing ground world, with a controlled biosphere and climate. But the Moon was severely damaged during a duel with a ship, which was controlled by the enemies of the human race, the so-called “Grays” (this is a roid race of creatures) and the Moon found itself “chained” to this planet forever, along with the entire crew. The body of the damaged Moon was covered with protective soil brought from Thera. It was obtained in abundance from great depths during construction underground structures under Arktida (now Antarctica). Then a genetic catastrophe, disease and war caused by the actions of an external enemy divided our ancestors into celestials and inhabitants of the planet. The trio of traitorous puppets, who seized power on the Moon with the help of viral weapons and biotechnology, made the remaining brothers weak-willed participants in a multi-thousand-year nightmare. Thus, the inhabitants of the upper lunar world, having betrayed their brothers, took the side of the hostile roid civilization, with which the human race had been fighting for its soul and Will in the vastness of the galaxies since time immemorial.

Vladimir Pyatibrat "Deep Book"

Since 1958 The American military was keenly interested in our neighbor, hoping to cover it with a network of military bases and turn it into a kind of “eye” of the Pentagon.

The benefits are obvious. Reconnaissance satellites and battle stations are easily detectable and vulnerable in their low-Earth orbits. In the evenings, anyone can see several of these space spies with the naked eye. But try to find the same devices if they are placed on the Moon! For a landing vehicle, the Moon covers with its body half of the devastating flow of ionizing radiation and meteoroids. Accordingly, on the Moon the service life of equipment should be 2 times longer than in orbit. There is no need to spend a limited supply of fuel on orienting the station and maintaining its flight altitude. Finally, lunar soil is capable of providing lunar base personnel with oxygen, water and metals. Already in our time, the leading specialist on the Moon, Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences Yu.G. Shkuratov noted the importance of the military aspect of lunar research: “So, if one state begins testing and storing new weapons on the far side of the Moon, and other countries are not able to deliver even a “pennant and coat of arms” there, then the possible consequences for the world economy and the economies of individual states can be very unpleasant..."

In the USSR, on the eve of its collapse, some measures were planned in this direction. US “research” probes are once again reaching out to the Moon. Japan, with the help of the Hagoromo lunar probe, announced its presence in cislunar space. In the near future, new Japanese and European spacecraft are planned to be launched to the Moon. In this regard, it is wise to reflect on the following topic.

Is it possible to guarantee that earthly humanity is the only intelligent force in the Universe? Since no one can give such a guarantee, it cannot be ruled out that the strategically important Moon has long been used by someone to monitor our unique planet. After all, about one and a half hundred stars have already accidentally flown almost through the solar system. Therefore, even without controversial interstellar flights, creatures from other worlds could be interested in the Earth and leave their legacy on the Moon. In any case, this possibility needs to be checked. Alas, carelessness is the basis of Earth’s space policy. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent trying to receive radio signals from distant stars. The search for traces of intelligent life on the Moon is actually taboo even for the vast majority of SETI activists (this generally accepted acronym stands for “Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence”). For example, the Bioastronomical Commission of the International Astronomical Union has officially limited its interest in SETI to "the search for radio transmissions of extraterrestrial origin." And the SETI Institute and the Planetary Society, which traditionally conduct experiments to search for radio signals from extraterrestrial civilizations, refuse to even discuss the very formulation of the task of lunar exploration.

I repeat: the Moon is a convenient platform for secretly monitoring our planet and occupies a strategic position, allowing us to control near space. Back in 1958 A Pentagon spokesman said that the main goal of US space policy should be the capture of bases on the Moon.

It is possible that this intention has already been realized a long time ago by those who are interested in the Earth. Many experts, starting with K.E. Tsiolkovsky, pointed to secret monitoring of restless humanity as the most likely strategy for the behavior of extraterrestrial intelligence in relation to the Earth. We try to keep an eye on each other and the Universe. Why shouldn't she keep an eye on us? And there is a logic of events: there was the first step of the earthlings and there was the first blow on the hands...

Let's figure it out a little because detailed analysis all the events related to the neighbor are the work of many scientists on thousands of pages...

There is a lot of false information about the Moon in textbooks, scientific and non-scientific publications. So many, and so erroneous, that the thought inevitably creeps in about some terrible secret connected with the Moon. Analyzing the features of the manifestation of lunar phenomena for their compliance with scientific interpretations, you come to the conclusion that a conspiracy theory is a completely sound theory. Moreover: the closest to the truth.

So, what absolutely does not fit into any systems, laws, and simply does not obey common sense...

Firstly, during the entire period of human flights into space, not a single professional selenologist has published a single book or article on the topic “inhabited, or previously inhabited, or visited by other intelligent civilizations”... This kind of taboo can be understood - selenologists (they are also astrophysicists, geologists, geophysicists, geochemists, but not archaeologists!) are engaged in the study of natural processes and formations. The search for artificial structures and objects simply goes beyond the scope of their professional practice. Therefore, there is a widespread belief among planetary scientists that if they have not yet noticed the construction of the Selenites, then the Moon has always been uninhabited. Often the possibility of the Moon being uninhabited is presented as a firmly established fact. But the Swedish chemist and mineralogist J. Berzelius wrote these wonderful words: “Whoever passes off probability as truth becomes, consciously or unconsciously, a deceiver.”

Secondly, it would seem that phenomena that are known, obvious, repeatedly repeated, documented, and obtained simultaneously from observers who do not know each other from different parts of the Earth should arouse the interest of specialists and stimulate research. However, in reality, scientists have a completely different desire - to “close” the problem even before any research. That's why the scientific press remains silent

3.4.1. Sunsets and sunrises. Moonsets and sunrises, and sunrises and sunsets, are two phenomena with very different dynamics, namely: the time of sunset and sunrise of the Sun changes by 1-3 minutes per day, while the Moon - from ten minutes to several hours. It's funny that almost no one knows about this. Take a calendar that shows the times of moonset and moonrise, and see for yourself.

3.4.2. Ebbs and flows. Since the time of Newton, all that has been heard is that the ebb and flow of the tides are associated with the Moon, and so is the weather. But is it? Aren't these just common superstitions? People talk a lot, but they don’t even want to count their change in the store. But it is simply believed that the Earth attracts its own water at least 300,000 times stronger than the Moon. Any particle of water is located at a distance of 6,371 km from the center of the Earth and at a distance of 380,000 km from the center of the Moon. The mass of the Earth is 81 times the mass of the Moon. So it turns out that the Moon attracts terrestrial water 300,000 times weaker than the Earth itself. Match the fly with the elephant! The atmospheric pressure on the ocean is no greater than lunar gravity. Pressure changes in the atmosphere are tied to the time of day. Moreover, the earth's axis has a tilt, leading to a change in temperature in the upper latitudes. The Earth, unlike the Moon, rotates around its axis, and the forces of inertia have not been canceled. Water is liquid and flowing, and continents are good partitions. And so on. In other words, the Earth has enough strength to deal with the ebb and flow of the tides.

There are physics textbooks where it is written what the tides should be - in accordance with the law of universal gravitation. And there are textbooks on oceanography, where it is written what the tides really are. If the law of universal gravitation operates here, and ocean water is attracted, among other things, to the Sun and the Moon, then the “physical” and “oceanographic” patterns of tides should coincide. So do they match or not? It turns out that to say that they do not coincide is to say nothing. Because the “physical” and “oceanographic” pictures of tides have nothing in common with each other. By the way, why are ebbs and flows not observed in the atmosphere? It is lighter and deeper than the oceans. Understand, well, a fly cannot lift an elephant, not by any “resonance”. Think about it - the difference in gravity between the Earth and the Moon is 300,000 times! Feel the difference. Does not help? Then go out into the meadow on a quiet moonlit night and watch carefully: not a single speck of dust, not a single blade of grass will flinch in the direction of the Moon’s movement. And if you believe Newton, then the Moon should simply pull out potatoes. Look at the oceans she supposedly rears up!

In fact, the Moon does not have any influence on earthly affairs; during the full moon it only causes the roofs of schizos to be demolished, and the howling of wolves and dogs. And we, people, don’t need such a Moon.

And the Earth doesn’t really need it like that. And in fact, the Moon is attracted to the Sun 2.2 times stronger than to the Earth.

3.4.3. Lunar anomalies. The Moon is associated with a whole series of absolutely glaring facts of inconsistencies with the established views of classical physics, which are bashfully called “lunar anomalies” in the literature and on the Internet.

The most obvious anomaly is the exact coincidence of the period of revolution of the Moon around the Earth and around its axis, which is why it always faces the Earth with one side. There are many reasons for these periods to become increasingly out of sync with each orbit of the Moon around the Earth. For example, no one would argue that the Earth and the Moon are two ideal spheres with a uniform distribution of mass inside. From the point of view of official physics, it is quite obvious that the movement of the Moon should be significantly influenced not only by the relative position of the Earth, the Moon and the Sun, but even by the passages of Mars and Venus during periods of maximum convergence of their orbits with the Earth’s. The experience of space flights in near-Earth orbit shows that it is possible to achieve lunar-type stabilization only if you constantly steer the orientation micromotors. But what and how does the Moon steer? And most importantly – for what? The “anomaly” looks even more disconcerting against the backdrop of the little-known fact that official science has not yet developed an acceptable explanation for the trajectory along which the Moon moves around the Earth. The Moon's orbit is by no means circular or even elliptical. The strange curve that the Moon traces above our heads is consistent only with a long list of statistical parameters set out in the corresponding tables. These data were collected on the basis of long-term observations, but not on the basis of any calculations. It is thanks to these data that it is possible to predict certain events with great accuracy, for example, solar or lunar eclipses, the maximum approach or distance of the Moon relative to the Earth, etc.

So, it is precisely on this strange trajectory that the Moon manages to always be turned towards the Earth with only one side!

Of course, this is not all. It turns out that the Earth does not move in its orbit around the Sun at a uniform speed, as official physics would like, but makes small slowdowns and jerks forward in the direction of its movement, which are synchronized with the corresponding position of the Moon. However, the Earth does not make any movements to the sides perpendicular to the direction of its orbit, despite the fact that the Moon can be on any side of the Earth in the plane of its orbit.

Official physics not only does not undertake to describe or explain these processes, it simply remains silent about them! This semi-monthly cycle of globe jerking correlates perfectly with statistical earthquake peaks, but where and when did you hear about it?

Did you know that in the Earth-Moon system of cosmic bodies there are no libration points predicted by Lagrange based on the law of “universal gravitation”? The fact is that the Moon’s gravitational region does not exceed a distance of 10,000 km from its surface. There is a lot of obvious evidence of this fact. It is enough to recall geostationary satellites, which are not affected by the position of the Moon in any way, or the scientific and satirical story with the Smart-1 probe from ESA, with the help of which they were going to photograph the Apollo lunar landing sites back in 2003-2005.

The Smart-1 probe was created as an experimental spacecraft with low ion thrust engines, but with a long operating time. The ESA mission provided for the gradual acceleration of the vehicle, launched into a circular orbit around the Earth, in order to, moving along a spiral trajectory with an increase in altitude, reach the inner libration point of the Earth-Moon system. According to the predictions of official physics, starting from this moment, the probe was supposed to change its trajectory, moving to a high lunar orbit, and begin a long braking maneuver, gradually narrowing the spiral around the Moon.

But everything would be fine if official physics and the calculations made with its help corresponded to reality. In fact, after reaching the libration point, Smart-1 continued its flight in an unwinding spiral, and on the next orbits it did not even think about reacting to the approaching Moon. From that moment on, an amazing conspiracy of silence and outright misinformation began around the flight of Smart-1, until the trajectory of its flight finally allowed it to simply crash on the surface of the Moon, which official popular science Internet resources hastened to report under the appropriate information sauce as about the great achievement of modern science, which suddenly decided to “change” the mission of the apparatus and, with all its might, smash tens of millions of foreign currency money spent on the project onto lunar dust.

Naturally, on the last orbit of its flight, the Smart-1 probe finally entered the lunar gravitational region, but it would not have been able to slow down to enter a low lunar orbit using its low-power engine. The calculations of European ballisticians came into striking conflict with reality.

And such cases in the exploration of near space are by no means isolated, but are repeated with enviable regularity, starting from the first attempts to hit the Moon or send probes to the satellites of Mars, ending with the latest attempts to enter orbit around asteroids or comets, the force of gravity of which is completely absent even at their surfaces.

But then the reader should have a completely logical question: how did the rocket and space industry of the USSR in the 60s and 70s of the twentieth century manage to explore the Moon with the help of automatic devices, being in captivity of false scientific views? How did Soviet ballistics calculate the correct flight path to the Moon and back, if one of the most basic formulas modern physics turns out to be a fiction? Finally, how in the 21st century are the orbits of automatic lunar satellites that take close photographs and scans of the Moon calculated? Yes, very simple! As in all other cases, when practice shows a discrepancy with physical theories, His Majesty Experience comes into play, which suggests correct solution one problem or another. After a series of completely natural failures, empirically, ballisticians have found certain “correction factors” for certain stages of flights to the Moon and other space bodies, which are entered into the on-board computers of modern automatic probes and space navigation systems.

And everything works! But most importantly, there is an opportunity to trumpet to the whole world about another victory of world science, and then to teach gullible children and students the formula of “universal gravity,” which has no more to do with reality than Baron Munchausen’s cocked hat has to do with his epic exploits.
And if suddenly some inventor comes up with yet another idea for a new method of transportation in space, there is nothing easier than declaring him a charlatan on the simple grounds that his calculations contradict the same notorious formula of “universal gravity”... Commission for Combating Pseudoscience at the Academies of Sciences different countries work tirelessly.

This is a prison, comrades. A large planetary prison with a slight touch of science to neutralize particularly zealous individuals who dare to be smart. For the rest, it’s enough to get married so that, following Karel Capek’s apt remark, their autobiography ends...

By the way, all the parameters of the trajectories and orbits of “manned flights” from NASA to the Moon in 1969-1972 were calculated and published precisely on the basis of assumptions about the existence of libration points and the fulfillment of the law of universal gravitation for the Earth-Moon system. Doesn’t this alone explain why all programs for manned exploration of the Moon were curtailed after the 70s of the twentieth century? What is easier: to quietly move away from the topic or to admit to falsifying all of physics?

Finally, the Moon has a number of amazing phenomena called “optical anomalies.” These anomalies are so out of step with official physics that it is preferable to remain silent about them completely, replacing interest in them with the supposedly constantly recorded activity of UFOs on the surface of the Moon. With the help of fabrications of the tabloid press, fake photo and video materials about supposedly flying saucers constantly moving over the Moon and huge alien structures on its surface, behind-the-scenes masters are trying to cover up with information noise the truly fantastic reality of the Moon, which should definitely be mentioned in this work.

The most obvious and visual optical anomaly of the Moon is visible to all earthlings with the naked eye, so one can only be surprised that almost no one pays attention to it. See what the Moon looks like in a clear night sky at full moon moments? It looks like a flat round body (like a coin), but not like a ball!

A spherical body with quite significant irregularities on its surface, if illuminated by a light source located behind the observer, should glow to the greatest extent closer to its center, and as it approaches the edge of the ball, the luminosity should gradually decrease. This is probably the most famous law of optics, which sounds like this: “The angle of incidence of a ray is equal to the angle of its reflection.” But this rule does not apply to the Moon. For reasons unknown to official physics, rays of light hitting the edge of the lunar ball are reflected... back to the Sun, which is why we see the Moon on a full moon, like a kind of coin, but not like a ball.

Even greater confusion is brought into the minds by an equally obvious observed thing - the constant value of the luminosity level of the illuminated areas of the Moon for an observer from Earth. Simply put, if we assume that the Moon has a certain property of directional scattering of light, then we have to admit that the reflection of light changes its angle depending on the position of the Sun-Earth-Moon system. No one can dispute the fact that even the narrow crescent of the young Moon gives a luminosity exactly the same as the corresponding central section of the half Moon. This means that the Moon somehow controls the angle of reflection of the sun's rays so that they are always reflected from its surface towards the Earth!

But when the full moon comes, the luminosity of the moon increases abruptly. This means that the surface of the Moon miraculously splits the reflected light into two main directions - towards the Sun and the Earth. This leads to another stunning conclusion that the Moon is practically invisible to an observer from space who is not on the straight lines Earth-Moon or Sun-Moon.

Who and why needed to hide the Moon in space in the optical range?...

To understand what the joke was, Soviet laboratories spent a lot of time on optical experiments with lunar soil delivered to Earth by the Luna-16, Luna-20 and Luna-24 automatic devices. However, the parameters of the reflection of light, including solar light, from the lunar soil fit well into all known canons of optics. The lunar soil on Earth did not at all want to show the wonders that we see on the Moon. It turns out that materials on the Moon and on Earth behave differently?

Quite possible. After all, as far as I know, a non-oxidizable film thickness of several iron atoms on the surface of any objects, as far as I know, has not yet been obtained in terrestrial laboratories...

Photos from the Moon, transmitted by Soviet and American machine guns that managed to land on its surface, added fuel to the fire. Imagine the surprise of the scientists of that time when all the photographs on the Moon were strictly black and white - without a single hint of the rainbow spectrum so familiar to us. If only the lunar landscape was photographed, evenly strewn with dust from meteorite explosions, this could somehow be understood. But even the color calibration plate on the body of the lander turned out to be black and white! Any color on the surface of the Moon turns into a corresponding gradation of gray, which is impartially recorded by all photographs of the surface of the Moon transmitted by automatic devices of different generations and missions to this day.

Now imagine in what a deep... puddle the Americans are sitting with their white, blue and red stars and stripes flags, supposedly photographed on the surface of the Moon by the valiant “pioneer” astronauts. Tell me, if you were them, would you try very hard to resume exploration of the Moon and get to its surface at least with the help of some kind of “pendo-descent”, knowing that the images or videos will only be in black and white? Unless you quickly paint them, like old films... But, damn it, what colors should you paint pieces of rocks, local stones or steep mountain slopes with?..

By the way, very similar problems awaited NASA on Mars. All researchers have probably already set their teeth on edge about the murky story with the color discrepancy, or more precisely, with a clear shift of the entire Martian visible spectrum on its surface to the red side. When NASA employees are suspected of deliberately distorting images from Mars (allegedly hiding the blue sky, green carpets of lawns, blue lakes, crawling locals...), I urge you to remember the Moon...

Think, maybe different physical laws simply apply on different planets?

Then a lot of things immediately fall into place!

But let's return to the Moon for now. Let's finish with the list of optical anomalies, and then move on to the next sections of lunar wonders.

A ray of light passing near the surface of the Moon receives significant variations in direction, which is why modern astronomy cannot even calculate the time required for the stars to cover the Moon’s body. Official science does not express any ideas why this happens, except for the wildly delusional electrostatic reasons for the movement of lunar dust at high altitudes above its surface or the activity of certain lunar volcanoes, which deliberately emit dust that refracts light exactly in the place where observations are being made. given star. And so, in fact, no one has observed lunar volcanoes yet.

As is known, terrestrial science is able to collect information about the chemical composition of distant celestial bodies by studying molecular emission-absorption spectra. So, for the celestial body closest to the Earth - the Moon - this method of determining the chemical composition of the surface does not work! The lunar spectrum is practically devoid of bands that can provide information about the composition of the Moon. The only reliable information about the chemical composition of lunar regolith was obtained, as is known, from the study of samples taken by the Soviet Luna probes. But even now, when it is possible to scan the surface of the Moon from low lunar orbit using automatic devices, reports of the presence of a particular chemical substance on its surface are extremely contradictory. Even on Mars, there is much more information.

And about one more amazing optical feature of the lunar surface. This property is a consequence of the unique backscattering of light with which I began my story about the optical anomalies of the Moon. So, almost all the light falling on the Moon is reflected towards the Sun and Earth. Let's remember that at night, under appropriate conditions, we can perfectly see the part of the Moon not illuminated by the Sun, which, in principle, should be completely black, if not for... the secondary illumination of the Earth! The Earth, being illuminated by the Sun, reflects part of the sunlight towards the Moon. And all this light that illuminates the shadow part of the Moon returns back to Earth!

From here it is completely logical to assume that on the surface of the Moon, even on the side illuminated by the Sun, twilight reigns all the time. This guess is perfectly confirmed by photographs of the lunar surface taken by Soviet lunar rovers. Look at them carefully if you have the chance; for everything that can be obtained. They were made in direct sunlight without the influence of atmospheric distortions, but they look as if the contrast of the black and white picture was increased in the earthly twilight.

Under such conditions, shadows from objects on the surface of the Moon should be completely black, illuminated only by nearby stars and planets, the level of illumination from which is many orders of magnitude lower than from the sun. This means that it is not possible to see an object located on the Moon in the shadow using any known optical means.

To summarize the optical phenomena of the Moon, we will give the floor to independent researcher A.A. Grishaev, the author of a book about the “digital” physical world, who, developing his ideas, points out in another article: “Taking into account the fact of the presence of these phenomena provides new, damning arguments in support of those who consider film and photographic materials that allegedly indicate the presence of American astronauts on the surface of the Moon. After all, we provide the keys for conducting the simplest and merciless independent examination. If we are shown, against the background of lunar landscapes flooded with sunlight (!), astronauts whose spacesuits do not have black shadows on the anti-solar side, or a well-lit figure of an astronaut in the shadow of the “lunar module,” or color (!) footage with a colorful rendering of the colors of the American flag - then this is all irrefutable evidence screaming of falsification. In fact, we are not aware of any film or photographic documentation depicting astronauts on the Moon under real lunar lighting and with a real lunar color “palette”.

And then he continues: “The physical conditions on the Moon are too abnormal - and it cannot be ruled out that the cislunar space is destructive for terrestrial organisms. Today we know the only model that explains the short-term effect of lunar gravity, and at the same time the origin of accompanying anomalous optical phenomena - this is our “unsteady space” model. And if this model is correct, then the vibrations of “unsteady space” below a certain height above the surface of the Moon are quite capable of breaking weak bonds in protein molecules - with the destruction of their tertiary and, possibly, secondary structures.

As far as we know, turtles returned alive from cislunar space on board the Soviet Zond-5 spacecraft, which flew around the Moon with a minimum distance from its surface of about 2000 km. It is possible that with the passage of the apparatus closer to the Moon, the animals would have died as a result of the denaturation of proteins in their bodies. If it is very difficult to protect yourself from cosmic radiation, but still possible, then there is no physical protection from vibrations of “unsteady space” ... "

And more about lunar anomalies, modern times:

Very strange behavior of the night star has been noticed, especially recently. It simply refused to obey the laws of celestial mechanics. Either the Moon rises in the northeast, despite the fact that at its previous rise it rose almost strictly in the east, then the speed of crossing the sky became uneven - it moves very slowly until its apogee, and then almost before our eyes goes beyond the horizon. Unnatural changes in the angle of inclination of the lunar crescent are also observed at the same time on different days of observation. Many people noticed that the illumination angle did not correspond to the surface of the Moon. This is when the Sun shines from one side, and the crescent Moon is illuminated from the opposite side.

And more about lunar anomalies, from history:

In ancient images of the pre-Columbian era of the Indians of the state of Chimu (Peru), you can see the narrow crescent of the Moon and a bright star between its horns, where a real star impossible to see. Similar drawings are common in the Old World. An example is Islamic symbolism - the star between the horns of the crescent moon can be seen on the flags of Algeria, Mauritania, Pakistan and Tunisia. This symbol is also found on the flag of non-Muslim Nepal. As American astronomer B.E. found out. Schaefer, such a symbol has been found across a vast territory from Italy to Iran since at least 470 BC. e. It is unlikely that the star on the dark side of the Moon is simply a figment of the imagination of artists, because it was actually seen, even with the naked eye.

1048 “This year a star appeared on the disk of the Moon when there was a new moon on May 14 in the first half of the night” (Armenian Chronicle of Etum Patmich. XIII century). The attempt to identify this event with the supernova explosion in 1054 suffers from obvious stretches.

1064 “And in those days a star of enormous brightness appeared in the circle of the Moon a few days after its separation from the Sun” (Chronicle of J. Malvetius).

1540 The Catalog of Transient Lunar Phenomena mentions an ancient engraving depicting the appearance of a “star” on the dark side of the young Moon on November 26th.

1587 5th of March. Many people saw a “star” on the Moon’s body “just between the ends of her horns” (Old English Chronicle).

1737 March 1. During a total eclipse of the Sun, a remarkable spot of light was observed on the disk of the Moon in the region of the Sea of Crises.

1888 July 15. On the dark side of the Moon, in the region of the lunar Caucasus, Holden noticed a “star” comparable to the brightest stars in the sky!

1924 August 16. “M.G. Iseli, Jora Observatory (Switzerland), notes a curious observation made on August 16 last at 20:30. He noticed, with the help of high magnification, a luminous point, at latitude 40°, a little above the chain of mountains of Rainbow Bay, not far from the famous volcano Aristarchus. Thinking that this was an illusion, the observer changed the telescope eyepiece, but the light remained. The next day, on the evening of August 17, the light was visible with great difficulty - the dark side of the Moon was lighter due to higher illumination than the day before."

3.4.4. Expeditions to the Moon. An amazing circumstance becomes clear if you look at the lunar expeditions. Over the entire period, about 100 attempts were made to send spacecraft from the Earth to the Moon. Of these, only in 44% of cases the flight program was basically completed. And when flying to the much more distant Venus, despite its clouds of sulfuric, hydrochloric and hydrofluoric acids and terrible conditions on the surface (temperatures up to +500 C, pressure about a hundred atmospheres), 67% of launches were successful. As we can see, flights to the nearest atmosphereless Moon are noticeably more dangerous than to a distant “hellish” planet! Paradox...

All failures can be attributed to incorrect ballistic calculations and technical problems, but some lunar spacecraft disasters were accompanied by strange phenomena on the surface of the Moon. For example, July 17, 1967 less than 1 hour before the landing of Surveyor 4, a cloud of dust was noticed in the center of the Agrippa crater. The station was descending only 390 km from the mysterious formation. And so, at the most crucial moment, 2.5 minutes before landing, radio communication with Surveyor 4 mysteriously fell silent and the device crashed.

When I saw the electronic components of the first spacecraft in the museum, I couldn’t help but wonder how such a thing could fly successfully? But a strange story also happened with the Japanese probe “Hagoromo” - the first earthling apparatus launched into selenocentric orbit after a fourteen-year break. After entering lunar orbit on March 19, 1990, radio contact with Hagoromo could not be established. According to the American Lunar Society, during the flight of the Hagoromo probe, a mysterious dot glowed on the dark side of the Moon for at least half an hour. Then something flashed in the Aristarchus crater, and an orange light burned ominously in the Gassendi circus. The device entered a selenocentric orbit, but radio contact with it could not be established

Contact was also lost with the next, American Clementine probe, which operated in orbit around the Moon in 1994.

Another example of this kind is the Apollo 16 flight in 1972. During the lunar landing, observers on Earth twice noticed strange increases in the brightness of the Censorinus crater, located near the landing site. Two days before the expedition departed for Earth, a column of light appeared northwest of the Aristarchus crater, increasing in height at a speed of 1.35 km/s. Having reached an altitude of 162 km, the pillar shifted 60 km from the starting point and blurred, existing for about 3 minutes. Lunar seismometers did not detect any noticeable ground shaking at this time. Consequently, it was not an eruption of gases or a meteorite fall - something unknown threw up a column of dust towards the stars.

So, something strange is happening on the moon. Mysterious flashes, lights, clouds would look harmless if not for the ominous statistics of lunar probe accidents.

3.4.5. Nuclear war on the moon. Not everything is clear with those lunar craters that are considered natural, that is, formed as a result of the fall of meteorites. There is every reason to believe that most of the craters on the Moon were caused by powerful nuclear explosions. This is evidenced, in particular, by the high content of radioactive isotopes of uranium and thorium in lunar samples. In other words, the Moon, or that gigantic artificial object that it probably and most likely is, was once subjected to a nuclear attack, which left traces across its entire surface and turned it into a desert.

According to most ufologists, representatives of several alien races are constantly present on Earth, who are fighting among themselves for dominance on the planet, hidden from us. In relatively recent antiquity, within the memory of mankind, this struggle was waged more openly and often with the use of nuclear weapons. It is logical to assume that the crew of a huge orbital station launched into orbit of our planet also took an active part in those space wars.

A group of English scientists, led by the famous astronomer G. Fielder, conducted a statistical and computer analysis of the location of lunar craters. It turned out that the vast majority of them are not located chaotically, as should be the case with their natural origin, but are grouped into complexes. In some cases, the craters form pairs, in others - chains, in others - they lie at the vertices of rectangles.

All this is easily explained if we assume that the Moon was once subjected to nuclear bombardment. To achieve the most destructive effect, bombs must be dropped at some distance from one another. Thus, the paired craters are traces of the explosions of two separated warheads of one missile. The chains are traces of continuous bombing from one flying object (interestingly, the chains of craters are very similar to the chains of craters from American bombs that were dropped from B-52 bombers during the Vietnam War). There is also a known method of throwing bombs at the vertices of triangles. During a nuclear bombardment, life inside these triangles is completely destroyed.

Almost 90% of craters are concentrated on the so-called continents. There are very few craters in the sea areas. This fact, difficult to explain from the standpoint of the meteorite hypothesis, agrees well with the hypothesis of nuclear war. If there really was water in the lunar seas at that time, then intelligent life was concentrated on land. These areas were targeted with atomic missiles.

3.4.6. Mutual gravity in the Earth-Moon system. Official physics taught in educational institutions, is very proud that she knows the relationships between different physical quantities in the form of formulas that are supposedly reliably supported experimentally. That’s where we stand, as they say... In particular, all reference books and textbooks state that between two bodies having masses (m) and (M), an attractive force (F) arises, which is directly proportional to the product of these masses and inversely proportional the square of the distance (R) between them. This relationship is usually presented in the form of the “law of universal gravitation” formula:

Where G is the gravitational constant, equal to approximately 6.6725;10;11 m;/(kg s;).

Let's use this formula to calculate the force of attraction between the Earth and the Moon, as well as between the Moon and the Sun. To do this, we need to substitute the corresponding values from reference books into this formula:

The mass of the Moon is 7.3477:10 to the 22nd power kg

Mass of the Sun – 1.9891:10 to the 30th power kg

Earth mass – 5.9737:10 to the 24th power kg

Distance between Earth and Moon = 380,000,000 m

Distance between the Moon and the Sun = 149,000,000,000 m

The force of attraction between the Earth and the Moon =
6.6725:10-11 x 7.3477:10 to the 22nd power x 5.9737:10 to the 24th power / 380,000,000 squared = 2.028:10 to the 20th power

The force of attraction between the Moon and the Sun =
6.6725:10-11 x 7.3477 10 to the 22nd power x 1.9891 1030 / 149,000,000,000 squared = 4.39:10 to the 20th power

It turns out that the force of attraction of the Moon to the Sun is more than twice (!) greater than the force of attraction of the Moon to the Earth! Why then does the Moon fly around the Earth, and not around the Sun? Where is the agreement between theory and experimental data? If you don't believe your eyes, please take a calculator, open the reference books and see for yourself.

According to the formula of “universal gravity”, for a given system of three bodies, as soon as the Moon is between the Earth and the Sun, it should leave the circular orbit around the Earth, turning into an independent planet with orbital parameters close to the Earth’s. However, the Moon stubbornly “does not notice” the Sun, as if it does not exist at all.

First of all, let's ask ourselves what could be wrong with this formula? There are few options here.

From a mathematical point of view, this formula may be correct, but then the values of its parameters are incorrect. For example, modern science can make serious mistakes in determining distances in space based on false ideas about the nature and speed of light; or it is incorrect to estimate the masses of celestial bodies, using the same purely speculative conclusions of Kepler or Laplace, expressed in the form of ratios of the sizes of orbits, velocities and masses of celestial bodies; or not at all understand the nature of the mass of a macroscopic body, which all physics textbooks talk about very frankly, postulating this property of material objects regardless of its location and without delving into the reasons for its occurrence.

Also, official science may be wrong about the reason for the existence and principles of action of the force of gravity, which is most likely. For example, if masses do not have an attractive effect (for which, by the way, there are thousands of visual evidences, only they are hushed up), then this “formula of universal gravitation” simply reflects a certain idea expressed by Isaac Newton, which turned out to be false.

You can make thousands of mistakes different ways, but the truth is one. And official physics deliberately hides it, otherwise how can one explain the upholding of such an absurd formula?

The first and obvious consequence of the fact that the “gravity formula” does not work is the fact that the Earth has no dynamic response to the Moon. Simply put, two such large and close celestial bodies, one of which is only four times smaller in diameter than the other, should (according to the views of modern physics) rotate around a common center of mass - the so-called. barycenter. But he's not there.

Well, besides this, the sphere of gravity of the Earth, within which the gravity of the Earth exceeds the gravity of the Sun, has a radius of 260,000 km (counting from the center of the Earth). The Moon, according to official data, is located far beyond this sphere. It turns out that the Moon is not so much a satellite of the Earth as an independent planet of the solar system “that has its own interest in remaining close to the Earth”...

And for the record: do you know that moonlight absorbs heat?.. It will be easy for you to check if you put two identical objects under the moonlight and in the shade, then measure it with a laser thermometer and... oppa-la and the temperature of the object in the dark turns out to be a few tenths of degrees higher!.. Are there any explanations for this phenomenon?..

Is the Moon an artificial satellite?

The first mystery of the Moon: artificial Moon or cosmic exchange

In fact, the orbit of motion and the size of the moon's satellite are physically almost impossible. If this were natural, one could argue that this is an extremely strange “whim” of the cosmos. This is due to the fact that the size of the Moon is equal to a quarter of the size of the Earth, and the ratio of the sizes of the satellite and the planet is always many times smaller. The distance from the Moon to the Earth is such that the sizes of the Sun and Moon are visually the same. This allows us to observe such a rare phenomenon as a total solar eclipse, when the Moon completely covers the Sun. The same mathematical impossibility applies to the masses of both celestial bodies. If the Moon were a body that at a certain moment was attracted by the Earth and acquired a natural orbit, then it would be expected that this orbit should be elliptical. Instead, it is strikingly round.

The second mystery of the Moon: the incredible curvature of the Moon's surface

The incredible curvature that the Moon's surface exhibits is inexplicable. The moon is not a round body. The results of geological studies lead to the conclusion that this planetoid is actually a hollow ball. Although it is such, scientists still cannot explain how the Moon can have such a strange structure without being destroyed. One explanation offered by the above-mentioned scientists is that the lunar crust was made of a solid titanium frame. Indeed, the lunar crust and rocks have been shown to have extraordinary levels of titanium. According to Russian scientists Vasin and Shcherbakov, the thickness of the titanium layer is 30 km.

The third mystery of the Moon: lunar craters

The explanation for the presence of a huge number of meteorite craters on the surface of the Moon is widely known - the absence of an atmosphere. Most cosmic bodies that try to penetrate Earth encounter kilometers of atmosphere on their way, and it all ends with the “aggressor” disintegrating. The Moon does not have the ability to protect its surface from the scars left by all the meteorites crashing into it - craters of all sizes. What remains unexplained is the shallow depth to which the aforementioned bodies were able to penetrate. It really looks as if a layer of extremely durable material prevented meteorites from penetrating into the center of the satellite. Even craters with a diameter of 150 kilometers do not exceed 4 kilometers deep into the Moon. This feature is inexplicable from the point of view of normal observations that there should be craters at least 50 km deep.

The fourth mystery of the Moon: “lunar seas”

How were the so-called “lunar seas” formed? These gigantic areas of solid lava, which originate from the interior of the Moon, could easily be explained if the Moon were a hot planet with a liquid interior, where they could arise from meteorite impacts. But physically, it is much more likely that the Moon, judging by its size, has always been a cold body. Another mystery is the location of the “lunar seas”. Why are 80% of them on the visible side of the Moon?

The fifth mystery of the Moon: mascons

The gravitational attraction on the surface of the Moon is not uniform. This effect had already been noted by the crew of Apollo VIII when it flew around the lunar sea zones. Mascones (from "Mass Concentration" - mass concentration) are places where a substance of greater density or quantity is believed to exist. This phenomenon is closely related to the lunar seas, since the mascons are located under them.

The sixth mystery of the Moon: geographic asymmetry

A rather shocking fact in science, which still cannot be explained, is the geographic asymmetry of the surface of the Moon. The famous "dark" side of the Moon has many more craters, mountains and relief features. In addition, as we already mentioned, most of the seas, on the contrary, are on the side that we can see.

The seventh mystery of the Moon: the low density of the Moon

The density of our satellite is 60% of the density of the Earth. This fact, together with various studies, proves that the Moon is a hollow object. Moreover, several scientists have ventured to suggest that the above-mentioned cavity is artificial. In fact, given the arrangement of the surface layers that have been identified, scientists argue that the Moon appears to be like a planet that formed "in reverse," and some have used this to argue for the "artificial casting" theory.

The Eighth Mystery of the Moon: Origin

In the last century, for a long time, three theories of the origin of the Moon were conventionally accepted. Currently, most of the scientific community has accepted the hypothesis of the artificial origin of the lunar planetoid as no less valid than others.

One theory suggests that the Moon is a fragment of the Earth. But the enormous differences in the nature of these two bodies make this theory practically untenable.

Another theory is that this celestial body formed at the same time as the Earth, from the same cloud of cosmic gas. But the previous conclusion is also valid in relation to this judgment, since the Earth and the Moon should have at least a similar structure.

The third theory suggests that, while wandering through space, the Moon fell into the earth's gravity, which caught and turned it into its “captive”. The big flaw in this explanation is that the Moon's orbit is essentially circular and cyclical. In such a phenomenon (when the satellite is “caught” by the planet), the orbit would be sufficiently distant from the center or, at least, would be some kind of ellipsoid.

The fourth assumption is the most incredible of all, but, in any case, it can explain the various anomalies that are associated with the Earth's satellite, since if the Moon were constructed by intelligent beings, then the physical laws to which it is subject would not be equally applicable to other celestial bodies.

The mysteries of the Moon put forward by scientists Vasin and Shcherbakov are only some real physical assessments of the Moon's anomalies. In addition, there are many other video, photographic evidence and studies that give confidence to those who think about the possibility that our “natural” satellite is not one.

Recently, a controversial video appeared on the Internet, which will be interesting within the framework of the topic under consideration:

Video description:

This video was made from Germany and was filmed over 4 days starting on July 7, 2014. It is clearly visible how “waves”, or rather a stripe, “runs” across the surface of the Moon, and this is similar to how the image of the lunar surface that we see from Earth is updated.

No matter how crazy it may sound, precisely such stripes have been noticed more than once when filming with various video cameras and telescopes. I think anyone with a video camera with a good zoom will be able to see the same thing.

And how, may I ask you, can I explain this? In my opinion, several explanations are possible, and adherents of the generally accepted picture of the world will not like all of them.

1. There is no Moon in the Earth’s orbit at all, but only a flat projection (hologram) creating the appearance of its presence. Moreover, this projection is quite primitive technically, judging by the fact that its creators were forced to create a flat projection and that is why the moon is turned to us on one side. This is simply saving resources to maintain the visible part of the Moon.

2. In the orbit of the Earth, there is indeed a certain object whose dimensions correspond to the “Moon” visible to us from the Earth, but in fact, what we see is only a hologram - a camouflage created on top of the object. This, by the way, explains why no one flies to the Moon. I think all the states that sent their spacecraft to the “Moon” know very well that under the guise of what we see from Earth, there is something completely different there.

These versions are supported by those facts that have long been surprising for their illogicality:

- Why humanity sends devices into deep space, but completely ignores the planet closest to us.

- Why are all the photographs of the moon transmitted by earthly satellites of such disgusting quality?

Why can’t astronomers, having advanced telescopes, take pictures of the lunar surface with a quality comparable at least to pictures from Mars or from earthly satellites. Why do satellites fly in Earth orbit that are capable of taking a photograph of a surface on which a car license plate is visible, while lunar satellites photograph the surface in such a resolution that one cannot dare to call it a photograph.

In addition, we present two fragments from RenTV films on the theme of the Moon. The reputation of this channel is known to everyone, but the information provided is useful for analyzing the arguments proposed above.

Is the Moon an artificial satellite?

The first mystery of the Moon: artificial Moon or cosmic exchange

The second mystery of the Moon: the incredible curvature of the Moon's surface

The third mystery of the Moon: lunar craters

The explanation for the presence of a huge number of meteorite craters on the surface of the Moon is widely known - the absence of an atmosphere. Most cosmic bodies that try to penetrate Earth encounter kilometers of atmosphere on their way, and it all ends with the “aggressor” disintegrating. The Moon has no ability to protect its surface from the scars left by all the meteorites crashing into it - craters of all sizes. What remains unexplained is the shallow depth to which the aforementioned bodies were able to penetrate. It really looks as if a layer of extremely durable material prevented meteorites from penetrating into the center of the satellite. Even craters with a diameter of 150 kilometers do not exceed 4 kilometers deep into the Moon. This feature is inexplicable from the point of view of normal observations that there should be craters at least 50 km deep.

The fourth mystery of the Moon: “lunar seas”

How were the so-called “lunar seas” formed? These gigantic areas of solid lava, which originate from the interior of the Moon, could easily be explained if the Moon were a hot planet with a liquid interior, where they could arise from meteorite impacts. But physically, it is much more likely that the Moon, judging by its size, has always been a cold body. Another mystery is the location of the “lunar seas.” Why are 80% of them on the visible side of the Moon?

The fifth mystery of the Moon: mascons

The gravitational attraction on the surface of the Moon is not uniform. This effect had already been noted by the crew of Apollo VIII when it flew around the lunar sea zones. Mascones (from "Mass Concentration" - mass concentration) are places where a substance is believed to exist at a higher density or in large quantities. This phenomenon is closely related to the lunar seas, since the mascons are located under them.

The sixth mystery of the Moon: geographic asymmetry

The seventh mystery of the Moon: the low density of the Moon

The density of our satellite is 60% of the density of the Earth. This fact, together with various studies, proves that the Moon is a hollow object. Moreover, several scientists have ventured to suggest that the above-mentioned cavity is artificial. In fact, given the surface layers that have been identified, scientists argue that the Moon appears to be like a planet that was formed "in reverse," and some have used this to argue for the "artificial casting" theory.

The Eighth Mystery of the Moon: Origin

One theory suggests that the Moon is a fragment of the Earth. But the enormous differences in the nature of these two bodies make this theory practically untenable.

Recently, a controversial video appeared on the Internet, which will be interesting within the framework of the topic under consideration:

Video description:

And how, may I ask you, can I explain this? In my opinion, several explanations are possible, and adherents of the generally accepted picture of the world will not like all of them.

These versions are supported by those facts that have long been surprising for their illogicality:

- Why humanity sends spacecraft into deep space, but completely ignores the planet closest to us.

- Why are all the photographs of the moon transmitted by earthly satellites of such disgusting quality?

The first mystery of the Moon: artificial Moon or cosmic exchange

The second mystery of the Moon: the incredible curvature of the Moon's surface

The incredible curvature that the Moon's surface exhibits is inexplicable. The moon is not a round body. The results of geological studies lead to the conclusion that this planetoid is actually a hollow ball. Although it is such, scientists still cannot explain how the Moon can have such a strange structure without being destroyed. One explanation offered by the above-mentioned scientists is that the lunar crust was made of a solid titanium frame. Indeed, the lunar crust and rocks have been shown to have extraordinary levels of titanium. According to Russian scientists Vasin and Shcherbakov, the thickness of the titanium layer is 30 km.

The third mystery of the Moon: lunar craters

The fourth mystery of the Moon: “lunar seas”

The fifth mystery of the Moon: mascons

The sixth mystery of the Moon: geographic asymmetry

The seventh mystery of the Moon: the low density of the Moon

The Eighth Mystery of the Moon: Origin

One theory suggests that the Moon is a fragment of the Earth. But the enormous differences in the nature of these two bodies make this theory practically untenable.

Recently, a controversial video appeared on the Internet, which will be interesting within the framework of the topic under consideration:

Video description:

And how, may I ask you, can I explain this? In my opinion, several explanations are possible, and adherents of the generally accepted picture of the world will not like all of them.

These versions are supported by those facts that have long been surprising for their illogicality:

Why does humanity send spacecraft into deep space, but completely ignores the planet closest to us?

Why do all the photographs of the moon transmitted by earthly satellites have such disgusting quality?

Related information.

Recently, at a meeting with journalists, the former head of NASA's lunar laboratory photography service, Ken Johnston, made a sensational statement. He claims that the US military has photographs of the Moon that show “man-made ruins.” Bearing in mind the discussion during which the American landing on the Moon was questioned, it is hardly worth trusting such statements. But be that as it may, a huge number of secrets are associated with the Earth’s satellite, and this is recognized by almost all astronomers

Friendship of giants

But what is so unusual, strange about the Moon?

One of the mysteries of the satellite is its origin. Comparative planetology says that the Earth is “not supposed to” have such a large satellite. The diameter of the Moon is almost 4000 km, and that of the Earth is just over 12 thousand km.

Mercury, Venus, and Mars do not have such satellites. Small, tens of kilometers across, satellites of Mars are unlikely to be related to the process of planet formation.

There is a special conversation about Pluto. The presence of large moons is the privilege of giant planets. Jupiter and Saturn have only five large satellites comparable to the Moon. And then suddenly the Earth has such a giant?!

Spawn of the Sun

Today in the scientific world three theories of the origin of the Moon are conventionally accepted.

One of them suggests that the Moon is a fragment of the Earth. But the huge differences in the nature of these two bodies make this theory practically untenable: the Earth and the Moon do not have a similar structure and are very different in density.

Another theory is that the Moon was "spawned" by the Sun as a planet in its own right, along with other terrestrial planets, and formed from the same cloud of cosmic gas. This assumption is at least supported by the fact that the Moon is very similar to another small terrestrial planet - Mercury. But how the Moon got into the Earth’s orbit (without colliding with the Earth!), and even with such a precisely defined distance from it, remains a mystery!

Non-standard orbit

The third theory suggests that, while wandering through space, the Moon fell into the earth's gravity, which caught it and turned it into its “captive”. However, the big drawback of this explanation is that the Moon's orbit is practically circular and cyclical. In cases where a planet “catches” a satellite, its orbit is quite distant from the center or at least represents an ellipsoid.

Walled civilization?

However, there are scientists who adhere to a completely extravagant theory. The point is that the Moon is an artificial satellite of the Earth - a kind of ancient cosmic analogue of Noah's Ark, deliberately launched into low-Earth orbit by aliens from other worlds.

If this is so, then the Moon should be hollow inside, with a thick and durable outer crust-shell, under which there may be the remains of a civilization “immured” in its depths for many centuries.

The “Alpine Valley” (Vallis Alpes) has also been known for a long time. It was like a giant knife cutting across the massif of the Lunar Alps. The length of this “cut” is 130 km, and the maximum width does not reach ten kilometers.

The theory of "artificial casting"

According to supporters of the “artificial casting” theory, their version is supported by some lunar oddities. For example, lunar craters.

It is known that the Moon has no atmosphere and its entire surface is literally covered with craters of various sizes left by meteorites crashing into it.

In the Sea of Clouds there is an interesting formation - the “Straight Wall”, a low, very gentle mountain ridge. The “wall” is a giant gentle step more than 100 km long and about 300 m high.

What remains unexplained is the shallow depth to which the aforementioned bodies were able to penetrate. Everything looks as if a layer of extremely durable material prevented meteorites from penetrating into the center of the satellite. Even craters with a diameter of 150 km do not exceed four kilometers in depth. This feature is inexplicable. In theory, there should be craters at least 50 kilometers deep on the Moon, but there are none.

This could only happen if the meteorites encountered an obstacle in the form of a “very hard shell” and all the energy of the explosion from the collision with the Moon, unable to penetrate deep into it, scattered the meteorological protective layer over the surface, forming lunar ring mountains - “circuses” .

Another argument in favor of the “artificial casting” theory is that under its hard shell the Moon has a very low density - 60% of the density of the Earth (3.34 g/cm3).

Artifacts

So the more we learn about the Moon, the more mysteries it presents us with. The US lunar programs - Rangers, Surveyors, Orbiters, Apollos - took over 150 thousand photographs in which you can see many strange objects.

Currently, 44 areas of the Moon are known where various artifacts have been found. They are being studied by specialists from the Space Information Bank Center, the Space Flight Center. Goddard, as well as the Planetary Institute in Houston.

Published by NASA (National Research Agency outer space USA) a catalog of lunar anomalies was released. The catalog covers observations over four centuries! It contains 579 examples that have not yet been explained: moving luminous objects, geometric figures, disappearing craters, colored trenches, giant domes changing their color, and finally, a large luminous object observed on November 26, 1956, called the “Maltese Cross” , etc.

In the area of the Tycho crater, mysterious terrace-like rock excavations were discovered.

Quick Spots

Moving objects are often observed in the Seas of Crisis and Tranquility. Thus, in the area of the latter in 1964, light or dark spots were seen at least four times, moving tens and even hundreds of kilometers in a few hours.

On September 11, 1967, for 8-9 seconds, Canadian scientists recorded a dark rectangular spot with purple edges here, which was clearly visible until it entered the night region. And 13 minutes later, along the path of the spot, near the Sabine crater, a flash of yellow light appeared. (Circular of the Lunar Section of the British Astronomical Society, 1967, vol. 2, 12.)

And, apparently, it was no coincidence that a year and a half later, Apollo 11 landed on the moon in this zone.

Shadow on the surface

One of the most interesting observations of recent times belongs to a Japanese amateur astronomer. Our television has repeatedly played a video recording of a shadow moving quickly across the surface of the Moon, which he made using a telescope. If this is not a hoax, then the size of the shadow (about 20 km in diameter) and the enormous speed of its movement (in two seconds the shadow traveled about 400 km) allow us to speak about a high technical level object.

"Public" observers

All these facts forced NASA to deliberately and seriously address anomalous phenomena on the Earth's satellite. In 1972, a special program was created, which involved dozens of experienced “public” observers armed with telescopes. NASA has assigned each of them four lunar regions where lunar phenomena have been repeatedly observed in the past. However, to date, NASA has closed information about their work.

Many craters, especially on the far side of the Moon, have a pronounced polygonal shape, which has not yet been explained. Thus, during the Apollo 15 flight, an anomalous area was photographed on the Moon. Its main object is the Southern Massif - a gigantic artifact with a base in the shape of a regular hexagon.

Space Race

At a meeting with journalists, Ken Johnston pointed out that both the United States and Russia are speeding up their lunar programs.

In December 2006, NASA announced plans to build an international base camp at one of the lunar poles, which is planned to be fully staffed by 2024. Russian manufacturer Energia rockets announced last summer an even more ambitious program - plans to build a permanent base on the Moon by 2015.

– The United States is deliberately speeding up space shuttle launches. Everything is being done to end this program ahead of schedule by 2010, and then move on to the new Constellation spacecraft, which will allow NASA to land on the Moon before the Russians do. Why such international attention to the lunar program of the 21st century? Maybe the Americans found “something” very important on the Moon that NASA forgot to tell us about? - Johnston sums up.

The grooves are strange formations on the surface of the Moon. Currently, there are three types of grooves: sinuous grooves, consisting of several curved curves, arcuate grooves, which form smooth arcs, and straight grooves. Long furrows reach a length of several hundred kilometers. It is believed that the sinuous grooves are the remains of ancient lava flows, but the origin of the arcuate and linear grooves is still a matter of research.

Moon. Secret area

Also on topic

Interpretation of Tarot Pentacles cards

Tibetan milk mushroom (kefir grain): chemical composition, application and medicinal properties

Why dream of washing floors according to other dream books

Bipolar disorder: symptoms and treatment for manic-depressive personality

History of the Second World War